If you’re looking for cost segregation services or studies in the Upstate of South Carolina, I can help. I’m based in Greenville and work with many building owners in Greenville, Spartanburg and Anderson to help them with their properties. We have saved owners a small fortune on their income taxes.
Our firm conducts an engineering-based cost segregation study that allows you as the owner to maximize the deductions you might have with your building(s) when it comes to depreciation. Reach out if you’d like a free, no-obligation estimate on what your income tax savings might be if you utilize cost segregation. We can do this on properties if they have been newly acquired as well as those that perhaps you’ve held for a number of years. Call me at 864-276-1448. John Murphy, CSSI.
Photo: Environmental and Energy Study Institute – ESSI
Cost segregation is a tax strategy used by commercial building owners to accelerate depreciation deductions on certain building components, such as electrical systems, plumbing, and HVAC systems. While cost segregation can provide financial benefits in the form of reduced tax liabilities, it may indirectly contribute to climate change mitigation efforts in a few ways:
Incentivizing Energy-Efficient Upgrades: Cost segregation can free up capital for building owners by providing immediate tax benefits. This additional capital can be reinvested in the property to make energy-efficient upgrades, such as installing energy-efficient lighting, insulation, windows, or HVAC systems. These improvements can help reduce a building’s energy consumption and carbon footprint.
Supporting Renewable Energy Investments: Building owners who benefit from cost segregation may choose to invest in renewable energy systems like solar panels or wind turbines. These investments can reduce a building’s reliance on fossil fuels and decrease greenhouse gas emissions.
Encouraging Sustainable Practices: As commercial building owners become more conscious of the environmental impact of their properties, they may be more inclined to adopt sustainable practices, such as recycling, waste reduction, and water conservation, in an effort to further reduce their carbon footprint.
Promoting LEED Certification: Cost segregation can help free up funds that can be used to pursue Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) certification or other green building certifications. Achieving these certifications often requires investments in energy-efficient building designs and technologies, which can lead to reduced energy consumption and environmental benefits.
It’s important to note that while cost segregation can indirectly support climate change mitigation efforts, its primary purpose is to optimize tax benefits for building owners. The extent to which cost segregation contributes to environmental sustainability will depend on the specific choices made by the building owner and the extent to which they prioritize sustainability in their investment decisions.
Additionally, tax laws and incentives related to energy-efficient building improvements and renewable energy systems may change over time, so it’s essential for building owners to stay informed about current regulations and consult with tax professionals to make informed decisions regarding cost segregation and its environmental implications.
If you’re looking for more details on how you can make your commercial buildings more environmentally friendly, ESSI has some excellent information.
What kinds of properties are good for cost segregation? I get asked this a lot especially as I introduce the concept of cost segregation to commercial real estate brokers. The fact of the matter is, cost segregation works on any and all properties where the owner is receiving a rent or lease payment. With the firm I represent, we generally add one more qualifier and say that the basis or cost needs to be about $200,000 for it to make sense to study. And the reason for that is the minimum study will cost about $2,000 and if you have a $200,000 building – maybe an SFR – you might see a depreciation expense of $30,000 – $40,000. If you’re at the 24% income tax rate, that’s a tax savings of $7,200 or so. Sometimes we still do studies down to about $150,000 in cost basis and it’s still a benefit for the owner.
Cost segregation works on all kinds of property:
Industrial
Manufacturing
Warehouse
Office Warehouse
Self Storage
Cold Storage
Office
Retail Strip Centers
Strip Malls
Restaurants
Fast Food Restaurants
Auto Repair Shops
Hotels / Motels
Apartment Buildings
Rental property – SFRs, Condos, Townhouses
Short-term rentals – Aibnb, VRBO
Gyms, Athletic and Fitness Centers
Determining if cost segregation is right for you is a fairly straight forward endeavor. You will always want to consult with your tax advisor about your particular situation. It really just becomes a math issue. You get an estimate from me and then discuss with your tax advisor. Does it make economic sense or not. It’s also not as expensive as you might have been led to believe. For most of our clients it is not a big set back and they typically see 10-20x return on the investment with us. That’s 1,000 – 2,000% return on your investment. It’s generally a no-brainer.
Build it in America Act is making its way through Congress. They are looking to extend 100% bonus depreciation through the end of 2025. Right now the law is that for buildings placed in service in 2023, the owner can take 80% bonus depreciation and then it’s slated to drop by 20 points each year until it’s zeroed out in 2027. This new bill allows for 100% bonus depreciation for ‘23, ‘24 and ‘25. No word what happens in 2026. I kind of figured they might extend this given the slowdown we are seeing in commercial real estate.
American Enterprise Institute has some details on what may be in the Build it in America Act which is dealing with tax reform to try to encourage more growth.
If you’d like a quote for cost segregation, I work all over the U.S. in all 50 states and represent Cost Segregation Services, Inc. We’ve successfully completed more than 40,000 engineering-based cost segregation studies over the past 20 years. We’ve studied all building types and classes in all 50 states. Give me a call at 864-276-1448
Tenant Improvements – Photo Credit John Murphy, Cost Seg Building
Are you looking to do tenant improvments (TIs) to your building? Are you aware that the Tangible Property Regulations (TPRs), i.e. repair regulations, are to your benefit as a building owner? There are specific guidelines to help building owners save money on their taxes when it comes to TIs. Many times we see that owners have capitalized items that could have been expensed. Not only is that the incorrect way to account for some items, the IRS doesn’t want you to do it that way and it’s costing you quite a bit in lost tax savings.
The words lessee and lessor in §1.162 and §1.263(a) (Tangible Property Regulations) are mentioned over 200 times. The TPRs are a dramatic change for landlord and tenants regarding the capitalization or expense deduction of tenant improvements.
There are two critical general rules under §1.263(a) for leased property and improvements.
The first general rule is that an improvement to a unit of property is NOT a separate unit of property from the building. The second general rule is if the landlord’s expenditure is NOT a restoration, adaptation, betterment, or improvement (RABI), then it is repair and maintenance. The unit of property for a taxpayer who is the lessee of an entire building is each separate building, its structural components, and building systems.
If the lessee leases only a portion of a building (such as an office, entire floor, or specified square footage), the portion of each building and the building systems associated with ONLY the leased portion is the unit of property. If the lessee pays for the tenant improvements, the lessee must generally capitalize the related amounts, which it pays to improve the tenant space. The only exception is if §110 applies. §110 is a construction allowance received by the lessee for the sole purpose of the improvement or when the improvement constitutes a substitute for rent.
In other words, tenants who do not lease the entire building and pay for their tenant improvements have their separate unit of property, and those improvements must be capitalized under the UNICAP rules §263A.
If the landlord pays for the tenant improvements, they must be put through the RABI rules (restoration, adaptation, betterment or improvement) to determine if the tenant improvements are a repair and maintenance item or if they must be capitalized. Generally, an amount capitalized as a tenant improvement is not a separate unit of property from the building. If the landlord’s tenant improvements are not a separate unit of property from the building, the landlord can compare the expenditure against the whole building, building structures, and building systems. The result will be that most landlord tenant improvements, (beyond the initial tenant improvements capitalized for each space), will be classified as a repair and maintenance expense.
Example
The landlord owns and operates two buildings. One is a 4-story office building of 40,000 square feet with the first floor consisting of retail space. The other building is a stand-alone 10,000-square-foot retail building. The landlord has two new tenants move in 2022. Tenant A leases the first floor of the 4-story building. Tenant B leases the stand-alone building. The landlord already had prior tenants in those spaces and has tenant improvements on its books for both of those building spaces. The landlord tears out the previous tenant improvements and does extensive new tenant improvements for both tenants.
Conclusion
The landlord can expense the tenant improvements for Tenant A in the office building but must capitalize the tenant improvements for Tenant B. The reason he can expense the TIs for the office building is that the space being renovated consists of only 25% of the building. The Tangible Property Regulations allow that if you are improving less than 30-35% of the building that those costs might be able to be expensed instead of capitalized. However, we will often see that owners have indeed capitalized such items.
Regarding Tenant B, the landlord must capitalize those improvements because because it’s 100% of the property. However, they can do a partial asset disposition (PAD) and get a significant tax deduction for the removal of those previous tenant improvements that had been in the building. PADs must be completed in the tax year in which the work (improvement / renovation) was done.
So what’s the difference between these two buildings? The landlord replaced a large physical portion of the stand-alone building that B occupied but only improved 25% of the building that tenant A was to occupy.
If you are a building owner and you are doing tenant improvements, reach out to consult with me at no charge. We can discuss your situation and see if it makes sense to expense or capitalize your improvements and whether or not it might qualify for a partial asset disposition.
Cost segregation works pretty much on all commercial buildings. If the building cost is north of $175,000 or so, there are tax savings being left on the table if the owner does not segregate the building in to 5, 7, 15, and 39 year class lives which is what happens when you do an engineering-based cost segregation study.
What might one see for results in such a study for a Panera Bread commercial building? Well, the owner might save about $100,000 on his/her income taxes by doing a study. The cost of the study would be a small fraction of the overall savings.
Let’s say in this scenario we have the following:
Building Cost: $1,500,000
Increased Accumulated Depreciation: $310,000
Estimated Tax Savings @32% Federal Rate: $99,200
The building owner doesn’t have to write a check to the IRS for that $99,200. The money stays in his/her bank account and they can do with it as they see fit….remodel bathrooms, buy a new building, buy a new car, pay off debt, increase wages for employees, buy a short term rental, take some vacations….they money is there’s and remains with them. I don’t care how much money people have…they could have millions, but there hasn’t been a single person yet that I’ve come across who says they aren’t interested in keeping an extra $100,000. And it doesn’t have to be $100,000….we run scenarios for all kinds of property…let’s say you own a building that is only $300,000 but by doing an engineering-based cost segregation study, you might be able to save $15,000-$20,000 on your taxes. That’s real money and people would rather keep that money in their bank accounts rather than the IRS’s.
Note, the numbers above are estimated tax savings. Each study is different and we wouldn’t know the final results until the actual study is completed. A building owner’s tax situation and tax rate might be different. If they were in the 37% tax bracket their tax savings would be quite a bit higher. If they are in a lower bracket then the savings would be lower. As always, I can’t give tax advice. When considering cost segregation, get an estimate and then discuss it with your own tax professional to see if you can benefit from doing a study.
